Let’s talk

Cyvora / AI security assessment

AI security assessment

Understand the risks of AI tools and integrations before they become part of everyday operations.

What we assess

Secure AI use.
Clearer boundaries.

AI adoption can introduce new paths for information disclosure, unauthorised actions and misuse. Cyvora’s AI security assessment can review the tools your team uses, the information they handle and the permissions they can exercise.

  • AI use cases, approved tools and shadow AI adoption
  • Data flows, sensitive information and provider settings
  • Authentication, access permissions and connected tools
  • Prompt injection and unsafe output handling in an authorised test scope
  • Logging, human oversight and incident escalation
  • Governance, privacy responsibilities and third-party dependencies

Scope & outcomes

Know what to
address first.

For small & medium businesses

Start with staff-facing AI tools, acceptable-use rules, information sharing and access. Prioritise practical controls that a lean team can maintain.

For enterprise organisations

Review AI applications, integrations and tool-enabled workflows across business units. Coordinate technical testing with governance, privacy and operational ownership.

Deliverables to agree

  • An AI use-case and data-flow inventory
  • A prioritised AI security risk register
  • Technical findings where testing is authorised
  • A remediation roadmap with owners and recommended controls

Testing targets, access, exclusions and evidence handling are agreed before work begins.

Planning your engagement

Review AI applications, agents and connected data

An AI security review should follow the actual use case. For staff-facing tools, the priorities may include approved use, information sharing and access. For a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) application, review which sources can be retrieved and whether permissions are enforced. For tool-enabled agents, examine what actions the agent can take and where human approval is required. Technical testing and governance review answer different questions, so the scope should explain which activities are included.

What to prepare before we start

Inventory the AI tools, models, integrations and data sources in scope. Identify system owners, permissions, providers and high-impact actions. Agree test environments, written authorisation and data handling before any adversarial testing; avoid using live confidential information as test material unless specifically approved.

AI security questions

What does an assessment cover?

Does this include AI penetration testing?+

It can include scoped adversarial testing of AI applications or integrations where explicitly authorised. A governance-only review and technical testing have different scopes; confirm which work is required.

Does an assessment certify that an AI system is safe?+

No. An assessment identifies risks and recommended controls within a defined scope. It does not establish that every risk has been found or provide certification.

Which AI frameworks can inform the work?+

NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 can inform governance and risk management. They complement technical security testing and should be selected for the use case and intended outcome.

Discuss an AI assessmentExplore security and AI frameworks
What is prompt injection in an AI application?

Prompt injection occurs when untrusted input attempts to change an AI application’s intended behaviour. A security review can examine whether external content influences access to data or tools and how permissions and approval boundaries limit unintended actions.

What should an AI agent security assessment cover?

Review the agent’s connected tools, permissions, data sources and approval steps, alongside logging and recovery arrangements. Test only within written authorisation. Focus on whether a misleading input can lead to data disclosure or an action outside the intended boundaries.